Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dr. Nase Photo Updates 2006 -- Remission for 7 Years

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Twickle Purple
    Definitely in remission. Definitely.
    Female, age 42. Using Zia Fresh Cleansing Gel, emu oil and ZZ cream.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by clsykes00
      If Peter can challenge me on my connection to Nase and any ulterior motive I have for making comments on RLT, I can challenge him on his rosacea pictures. I didn't see any of you stand up for me when he challenges me, even six months ago.

      Now, let's see the pictures Peter or lets see proof to support your claims about me.
      But that isnt really the same is it.

      Whether Peter does or doesnt have rosacea is a little irrelevant. He has made his case against Geoffrey and his supports regardless of his own condition. But to add to that, logic dictates that Peter would have to be a rosacea sufferer for him to be an active member of the community for so long. For anyone to challenge him on this is just absurd and rather pointless.

      On the other hand, if you are trolling this forum whisking up trouble out of faith to Dr Nase (which is totally plausible, as many have done so before), then I think any member here has the right to call you out on it.

      Trey, Im sure you'll agree that there is no more fairer mind person than me. But I just cant agree with you on this one. If you had been unfairly treated, you can bet your arse I would have been one of the ones fighting your corner (just as I did for Geoffrey when he needed me). But I cant let faith in a friend blind me to the obvious truth.

      And your argument here doesnt hold water at all. If Peter accuses you of something that very could be the truth and is HIGHLY relevant to this debate, then that does not give you license to make up a load of irrelevant bull**** about him in the pursuit of insighting trouble. Thats just trolling.

      Please Trey, Im appealing to your better nature here. Please dont let anything blind you from the truth OR prevent you from behaving in a good, honourable way.

      BB

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bob Bear
        Originally posted by clsykes00
        If Peter can challenge me on my connection to Nase and any ulterior motive I have for making comments on RLT, I can challenge him on his rosacea pictures. I didn't see any of you stand up for me when he challenges me, even six months ago.

        Now, let's see the pictures Peter or lets see proof to support your claims about me.
        But that isnt really the same is it.

        Whether Peter does or doesnt have rosacea is a little irrelevant. He has made his case against Geoffrey and his supports regardless of his own condition. But to add to that, logic dictates that Peter would have to be a rosacea sufferer for him to be an active member of the community for so long. For anyone to challenge him on this is just absurd and rather pointless.

        On the other hand, if you are trolling this forum whisking up trouble out of faith to Dr Nase (which is totally plausible, as many have done so before), then I think any member here has the right to call you out on it.

        Trey, Im sure you'll agree that there is no more fairer mind person than me. But I just cant agree with you on this one. If you had been unfairly treated, you can bet your arse I would have been one of the ones fighting your corner (just as I did for Geoffrey when he needed me). But I cant let faith in a friend blind me to the obvious truth.

        And your argument here doesnt hold water at all. If Peter accuses you of something that very could be the truth and is HIGHLY relevant to this debate, then that does not give you license to make up a load of irrelevant bull**** about him in the pursuit of insighting trouble. Thats just trolling.

        Please Trey, Im appealing to your better nature here. Please dont let anything blind you from the truth OR prevent you from behaving in a good, honourable way.

        BB
        We see things differently.

        I have asked for proof from Peter on several occasions regarding his accusation, and he continues to use these accusations without support.

        If you BB were accused of something, I would expect you to stand up for yourself. To not do so, is injustice to yourself.

        I am only asking for him to provide something relatively easy things: pictures and proof of his accusations of me. Should be simple if either have basis.

        Now, let me stand against for those things he has accused me of and please kindly remove yourself from a discussion that really does not pertain to you. After all, this is in the meta-forum discussion group, not in the general discussion area. If you don't like it, then don't read it.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by clsykes00
          If you don't like it, then don't read it.
          Please feel free to follow your own advice.

          Happiness is a choice.

          Comment


          • I have asked for proof from Peter on several occasions regarding his accusation, and he continues to use these accusations without support.
            He does yes, but dont you see that what he is accusing you of is very possible and VERY relevant to the well fair board?

            If Peter is lying in his accusations against you, then the obvious thing would be to prove him wrong. Instead you choose to fight fire with fire and accuse Peter of something. The problem is that what you accuse Peter of is absurd and irrelevant!

            That is no way to debate! If you want to send Peter home with a black eye, you simply prove him wrong in his claims against you. End of story, case closed, you win.

            If you BB were accused of something, I would expect you to stand up for yourself. To not do so, is injustice to yourself.
            Its funny you should say that, because for MONTHS I had to put up with daily accusations that I was indeed Dr Nase in disguise. I had people who I thought I knew (in the cyber sense) pm'ing me and asking me to prove my identity!

            What did I do?

            I took the moral high ground and allowed my behaviour and work on the boards to prove my case. Within a short time, the malicious nature of the trolls became obvious and their case destroyed.

            This is how an honourable person behaves Trey. With intergity and respect (for oneself aswell as others).


            I am only asking for him to provide something relatively easy things: pictures and proof of his accusations of me. Should be simple if either have basis.
            My whole point for confronting you on this Trey is that I (and everyone else it appears) feel that you have no right to demand this. Peter making a genuine accusation of you DOES NOT entitle you to make any daft accusation back and demand personal details as evidence.

            When the trolls were out for my blood several of them demanding I prove my identity by giving them my home address, photos, phone number. Do you think I should have given those things to them?

            No, me neither.

            Had they come to me with a genuine complaint and asked for none personal information to prove my innocence, then I would ofcourse have provided it, if only to clear my good name.


            Now, let me stand against for those things he has accused me of and please kindly remove yourself from a discussion that really does not pertain to you.
            A major fraud that disrupts the entire forum is ABSOLUTELY my business, just as it is everyone elses. Why? Because it NEVER remains contained to one isolated thread.

            I mean, did you or I keep our opinions to ourselves when Dr Nase had his dispute with the Debunkers? Did we bollocks! Why? Because it was important to all of us.

            If you wish to keep this entirely between just yourself and Peter, then I suggest you continue in private.

            BB

            Comment


            • Did we bollocks!
              What does that mean?
              Translation please!!

              Comment


              • Bollocks:

                N. British Vulgar. rubbish; nonsense; claptrap (often used interjectionally).

                V. Make a mess of, destroy or ruin; "I botched the dinner and we had to eat out"; "the pianist screwed up the difficult passage in the second movement"

                Source.

                Happiness is a choice.

                Comment


                • oooooh - thanks, TP.

                  Living here in the south, I mean the southwest, actually the southern midwest corner of Toledo, or maybe the west coast of Kentucky.... anyhow, no one in my corner of the world uses those words!

                  Comment


                  • Actually, I should add that in this case, I think it means "absolutely not, sir."

                    Originally posted by Millie
                    oooooh - thanks, TP.

                    Living here in the south, I mean the southwest, actually the southern midwest corner of Toledo, or maybe the west coast of Kentucky.... anyhow, no one in my corner of the world uses those words!
                    I know how it is. For sure. When I turn a corner in the house sometimes I am not sure what province I've entered. And, the stairs! Oh my goodness, just climbing the stairs leads me to whole new countries!!

                    Happiness is a choice.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bob Bear
                      I have asked for proof from Peter on several occasions regarding his accusation, and he continues to use these accusations without support.
                      He does yes, but dont you see that what he is accusing you of is very possible and VERY relevant to the well fair board?

                      If Peter is lying in his accusations against you, then the obvious thing would be to prove him wrong. Instead you choose to fight fire with fire and accuse Peter of something. The problem is that what you accuse Peter of is absurd and irrelevant!

                      That is no way to debate! If you want to send Peter home with a black eye, you simply prove him wrong in his claims against you. End of story, case closed, you win.

                      If you BB were accused of something, I would expect you to stand up for yourself. To not do so, is injustice to yourself.
                      Its funny you should say that, because for MONTHS I had to put up with daily accusations that I was indeed Dr Nase in disguise. I had people who I thought I knew (in the cyber sense) pm'ing me and asking me to prove my identity!

                      What did I do?

                      I took the moral high ground and allowed my behaviour and work on the boards to prove my case. Within a short time, the malicious nature of the trolls became obvious and their case destroyed.

                      This is how an honourable person behaves Trey. With intergity and respect (for oneself aswell as others).


                      I am only asking for him to provide something relatively easy things: pictures and proof of his accusations of me. Should be simple if either have basis.
                      My whole point for confronting you on this Trey is that I (and everyone else it appears) feel that you have no right to demand this. Peter making a genuine accusation of you DOES NOT entitle you to make any daft accusation back and demand personal details as evidence.

                      When the trolls were out for my blood several of them demanding I prove my identity by giving them my home address, photos, phone number. Do you think I should have given those things to them?

                      No, me neither.

                      Had they come to me with a genuine complaint and asked for none personal information to prove my innocence, then I would ofcourse have provided it, if only to clear my good name.


                      Now, let me stand against for those things he has accused me of and please kindly remove yourself from a discussion that really does not pertain to you.
                      A major fraud that disrupts the entire forum is ABSOLUTELY my business, just as it is everyone elses. Why? Because it NEVER remains contained to one isolated thread.

                      I mean, did you or I keep our opinions to ourselves when Dr Nase had his dispute with the Debunkers? Did we bollocks! Why? Because it was important to all of us.

                      If you wish to keep this entirely between just yourself and Peter, then I suggest you continue in private.

                      BB
                      If Peter makes a public accusation of me, he needs to publicly prove his accusation.

                      He cannot provide information to back his claims so he remains silent on these issues. He cannot prove that I have economic interests that gives reason for my posts on RLT because it does not exist. He cannot prove that I have any relation to Dr Nase, because it does not exist. How would you expect me to prove something that does not exist? Give me such a way, and I will provide such support for you BB.

                      Asking for a simple thing like pictures isn't that hard. Are you saying pictures are tough to present? Come on!

                      I still really do not understand why you are involved.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by clsykes00
                        I still really do not understand why you are involved.
                        Our good and kind Trey never ever involves himself in things that do not concern him. He's the absolute picture of support and civility. O

                        Happiness is a choice.

                        Comment


                        • Comeon, Trey - lighten up and have some fun!

                          Geez - I cannot even remember what point you are trying to make.

                          Comment


                          • Ah Milllie, it is the fight that matters, not the point!

                            Happiness is a choice.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by clsykes00

                              Im still waiting for the proof Peter. As well as the proof of your insinuations that I have economic interests that account for my posts.

                              You are a liar Peter.

                              While you're at it, produce pictures of your rosacea Peter, especially since the potential ocular symptoms I saw aren't reality. Ask your mum for some.
                              Hello Trey

                              Sorry I have only just got home having been out enjoying myself - you should try it.

                              Tell me were you born a jerk or did you have to practise?

                              I have just quickly read through 50 e mails and Forum posts and apparently you mention I am silent amongst other things. As it's late here I'm off to bed so tough ****.

                              But just before I go sorry I can't ask my Mum that question because she died in 1999 from Alzheimer's disease. I watched her die slowly from this awful disease. Do you want proof? My Dad died the previous year from Parkinson's disease. I watched him slowly lose control over every muscle in his body and eventually die but it took over 10 years and I finished up pushing him round in a wheelchair. Do you want proof? Towards the end of their lives my rosacea which had previously been mild just took off. Do you want proof? Sorry I didn't feel like taking pictures at the time of my rosacea. Must have been stress I reckon that caused my rosacea to go bad? Do you want proof?

                              I think some of this is contained in my story and RLT report. Gamache (another loyal Nase supporter) very kindly posted it recently in the "Why is the Hammersmith Trial taking so long" Nase mocked me a couple of times over this unfortunate, sad period of my life. I commented on this in a recent e mail I sent him which I posted up on the Forum. I suppose you want proof. This is the man you supported through thick and thin but you want proof of this of course?

                              I think I might make this my last post on here because I'm pissed off dealing with idiots like you. Would you like proof?

                              Goodnight

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Peter
                                Tell me were you born a jerk or did you have to practise?
                                I vote "Practise". Practise makes perfect, and he is very well practised. Plenty of "proof" of that here.

                                I am sorry about your folks. That's really hard. You've got a lovely, happy family it seems which must be a great comfort.

                                Have a good sleep Peter.

                                Twickle Purple

                                Happiness is a choice.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X